[ad_1]
After calling Google’s latest AI launch ‘Gemini’ a “global embarrassment” for its historic failures in imaging, Vivek Ramaswamy, the biotech entrepreneur and former presidential candidate, took a dig at the creators of AI from big technology companies, claiming that they are “programmed.” by the incentive structures created by their employers.
Google is trying to address concerns about its new AI-powered tool, Gemini, which has been hailed as a breakthrough in AI image generation, as people accuse it of overcorrecting and producing historically inaccurate photos, labeling them as “too awake.”
The debate centers on the tool’s ability to provide images that represent genders and races that are historically erratic, such as depicting World War II troops and the founding fathers of the United States as women and people of diverse ethnic backgrounds, which that deviates from reality.
Ramaswamy weighs in on Google’s AI Chatbot Gemini debate
Ramaswamy was responding to American-born software engineer and tech guru Marc Lowell Andreessen, who called the “seemingly strange result” 100 percent intentional, adding that high-tech AI develops its content by implementing exactly the goal. ideological, radical and biased of its designers.
“I know it’s hard to believe, but Big Tech AI generates the result it generates because it precisely executes the specific ideological, radical and biased agenda of its creators. The seemingly strange output is 100% intentional. It is working as designed,” Andreessen wrote on X (formerly Twitter), owned by billionaire Elon Musk.
“The creators of Big Tech AI are human beings who are “programmed” by the incentive structures created by their employers: cushy, well-paying jobs if you say the right things, fired like James Damore if you say the wrong things. That’s two layers of programming at work,” Ramaswamy reacted while reposting Andreessen’s post.
Who is James Damore?
Fired Google software engineer James Damore, author of a sexist manifesto criticizing Google’s efforts to narrow the gender gap, claimed the search engine company discriminates against conservative white men.
Damore’s controversial 10-page document, posted on an internal Google message board in August, claimed that women are underrepresented in tech because of “personality differences” between the sexes, not because of discrimination in the workplace. Workplace.
Previously, Ramaswamy commented on the Gemini AI issue, calling Google AI’s chatbot “blatantly racist” and blaming the company for programming its employees “with broken incentives.”
“The embarrassing global launch of Google’s LLM has proven that James Damore was 100% right about Google’s descent into an ideological echo chamber. The employees working at Gemini surely realized it was a mistake to make it so blatantly racist, but they probably kept their mouths shut because they didn’t want to get fired like Damore. “These companies program their employees with broken incentives, and those employees then program the AI with the same biases,” he wrote.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk previously criticized the AI chatbot. “I’m glad Google overplayed its hand with its AI imaging as it made its crazy racist and anti-civilization programming clear to everyone,” he wrote in a post on X.
What was Google’s response?
Jack Krawczyk, senior director at Gemini Experiences, acknowledged the problem, adding that while the tool generates a wide range of people around the world, it “missed the mark” in historical circumstances.
“We are working to improve these types of representations immediately,” he said. Google has paused the tool’s ability to generate photos of people while they look to fix the errors.
This is not the first time AI has failed to address real-world diversity issues. Google faced backlash nearly a decade ago when its imaging app incorrectly labeled a photo of a black couple as “gorillas.”
OpenAI, a competitor in the AI space, has also been accused of promoting stereotypes through its Dall-E image generator.